Gujarat High Court refuses to grant Rahul Gandhi interim relief over plea seeking stay of conviction in criminal defamation case

The court said it will pass a final order after going through the records and proceedings, and posted the matter post-summer vacation.

ByPTI

Published May 02, 2023 | 7:06 PMUpdatedMay 02, 2023 | 7:06 PM

Rahul Gandhi during Congress election campaign in Karnataka. (Twitter)

The Gujarat High Court on Tuesday, 2 May, refused to grant interim relief to Congress leader and disqualified Wayanad MP Rahul Gandhi on his plea for a stay of conviction in a criminal defamation case over his “Modi surname” remark, saying it will pass its final order post-summer vacation.

Counsel for Rahul Gandhi, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, cited “extreme urgency” to request from the court for an interim or a final order after arguments from both sides in the matter concluded during the day.

The court of Justice Hemant Prachchhak, however, said no interim protection can be granted at this stage.

Related: Rahul Gandhi to launch nationwide campaign against disqualification

‘Final order post summer vacation’

Justice Prachchhak said he will pass a final order only after going through the records and proceedings, and posted the matter for verdict after reopening of the high court post- summer vacation, which will be from 8 May to 3 June.

Advocate Nirupam Nanavati, who appeared for Gujarat Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLA Purnesh Modi, the original complainant in the case, also opposed Singhvi’s prayer for interim relief to the disqualified Lok Sabha MP.

The high court heard Gandhi’s appeal against the sessions court’s order last month refusing to stay his conviction in the 2019 defamation case after a trial court in Surat convicted and sentenced him to two years in jail, leading to his disqualification as a Member of Parliament.

The Congress leader was elected to the Lok Sabha from Wayanad in Kerala in 2019.

The Surat trial court had on 23 March sentenced the former Congress president to two years in jail after convicting him under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 499 and 500 (related to criminal defamation) in the case filed by BJP legislator Modi.

Related: A divided Opposition unites for disqualified MP Rahul Gandhi

Modi, a former Gujarat minister, had filed a criminal defamation case against Gandhi over his “How come all thieves have Modi as the common surname?’ remark made during an election rally at Kolar in Karnataka on 13 April, 2019.

On 3 April this year, Gandhi’s lawyer approached the Surat sessions court and filed two applications — one for bail and the other for stay of conviction pending his appeal along with his main appeal against the lower court’s order sentencing him to two years in jail.

While the sessions court granted bail to Gandhi, it rejected his plea for stay on conviction.

On 26 April, Justice Gita Gopi recused herself from hearing the case after it was presented before her for an urgent hearing.

The matter was then assigned to Justice Prachchhak.

(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)