Kerala Finance Minister questioned why details of the borrowing limits of the state were sent "secretly" to an MoS instead of the state.
Kerala Finance Minister KN Balagopal and Union MoS Muraleedharan. (Twitter)
A war of words erupted on Monday, 29 May, between Union Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs V Muraleedharan and Kerala Finance Minister KN Balagopal regarding the alleged reduction in the state government’s borrowing capacity. Both blamed each other for trying to mislead the public on the issue.
Muraleedharan claimed the “financial mismanagement and extravagance” of the LDF government resulted in the financial crisis Kerala was facing. Also that it was the reason for the state’s huge debt.
He also refuted the allegations of the ruling Left government in Kerala that the Centre had reduced the state’s borrowing capacity.
Earlier in the day, on 29 May, at a press conference held in Thiruvananthapuram, Muraleedharan termed as an “extravagance” the honorarium approved for expelled Congress leader KV Thomas, now appointed as the state’s representative in New Delhi, and the foreign trips of Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and the state’s ministers.
The minister further said some of India’s neighbouring countries were in dire economic straits due to their financial policies, and as the centre did not want a similar situation here, restrictions were placed on borrowings by states.
“So, I would like to ask the state finance minister and the chief minister not to foist the blame for it on the central government,” Muraleedharan told reporters at the press conference held by him.
The Union minister said he was not sure whether Chief Minister Vijayan and Kerala Finance Minister Balagopal were blaming the centre “because they lacked knowledge about such matters” or if it was a “deliberate and conscious” attempt to mislead the public.
Hitting back, Balagopal said Muraleedharan was trying to mislead people and achieve political gains through such baseless and objectionable statements.
Responding to the allegations and contentions of Muraleedharan, Finance Minister KN Balagopal, later in the day, on 29 May, said the Union Minister gave “inaccurate figures” and “made baseless arguments for political gains and to mislead the people”. “Such a stand is highly objectionable,” he said in a statement.
Muraleedharan’s contentions came in the wake of Kerala CM Vijayan lashing out at the BJP-ruled centre by terming its alleged move to reduce Kerala’s borrowing capacity by half as “sadistic”.
Two days before that, Balagopal had contended that it was “part of the Union government’s political vendetta”. Balagopal had also claimed that no reason was given for cutting the state’s borrowing limits by half.
Refuting the allegations of the LDF government, Muraleedharan cited figures of the borrowings allowed for the state and how much of it has allegedly already been availed of by Kerala.
The Union minister said that for the financial year 2023-24, Kerala was allowed to borrow ₹32,442 crore as 3 percent of its Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in accordance with the recommendations of the 15th Finance Commission.
Additionally, it was also permitted ₹20,985 crore under replacement borrowing, and besides that, ₹1,755 crore was sanctioned for the state as a central contribution under the National Pension Scheme (NPS), he said.
“In total, ₹55,182 crore is allowed to be borrowed in this financial year. Out of that ₹34,661 crore has already been taken by the state till now. Of the remaining ₹20,521 crore, the centre sanctioned ₹15,390 crore for the first nine months.
“The balance of ₹5,131 crore would be given towards the end of the financial year,” the minister said.
He said if the amount for the last quarter was denied by the centre, then there may be some weight in the claims by Balagopal, but the Union government has not said anything like that.
“So where is the reduction? Therefore, there is no question of political vendetta. Either the finance minister and chief minister have no clue about how these figures were arrived at, or they are deliberately and consciously trying to mislead the public,” Muraleedharan contended.
Balagopal, countering claims of the union minister and the figures cited by him, said that after receiving a letter from the centre that Kerala’s approved borrowing limit was ₹32,000 crore, another communication was received on 26 May stating that ₹15,390 crore has been sanctioned for this year.
The 26 May letter further said that out of the ₹15,390 crore, the state can only borrow ₹13,390 after deducting the ₹2,000 crore sanctioned in April, the finance minister claimed.
“In this context, it is extremely embarrassing that the union minister of state himself has come up with a misleading figure,” he said.
Balagopal also questioned why details of the borrowing limits of the state were being sent “secretly” to a union minister of state instead of directly to the state government.
He said that the Left government has a clear idea about its debt and how much it can borrow, and so does the central government.
However, the union minister was coming forth with “baseless arguments” hoping that if someone is misled by it, let them be, Balagopal alleged.
Muraleedharan, in his press conference, claimed that according to a recent RBI report, Kerala was one of the five states in the country with the highest debts and asked why the state required so much money.
“Is it to pay an honorarium to people like KV Thomas, who probably already gets a pension for being a former teacher and a former MP? Is it for foreign trips of the CM and the ministers?” he asked.
“This kind of extravagance cannot be permitted by the centre as otherwise, we might end up in the same financial situation as some of our neighbouring countries. That is the reason for the restrictions on borrowing by states,” Muraleedharan said.
The CPI(M)-led LDF government in Kerala last week approved an honorarium of ₹1 lakh per month for its cabinet rank special representative, expelled Congress leader KV Thomas, in New Delhi.
The decision was taken in a cabinet meeting. Besides the honorarium, the cabinet also allowed Thomas to hire two assistants, one office attendant and a driver.
(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)
May 20, 2024
May 20, 2024
May 19, 2024
May 19, 2024
May 19, 2024
May 19, 2024
