Jesna's father told South First that the new findings regarding Jesna's disappearance were completely wrong.
Published Aug 18, 2024 | 10:24 AM ⚊ Updated Aug 18, 2024 | 10:24 AM
Jesna Maria James is missing since 22 March 2018. (Sourced)
James Joseph, father of Jesna Maria James who has been missing since 2018 from Pathanamthitta in Kerala, said that a news report of a woman spotting her was not a recent development.
Asianet News on Sunday, 18 July, reported that a former staff member of a lodge in Mundakkayan in Kottayam had seen her with a young man days before she disappeared.
The woman revealed to the news channel that she had seen a girl resembling Jesna at the lodge.
She identified the girl from a newspaper photo. The woman described the girl as thin and fair and was wearing a pink-coloured churidar.
“The girl and the boy booked room number 102 at the lodge. The boy, described as fair and thin, booked the room and left with the girl after 4 pm on that day,” the lady said.
The former lodge employee stated that the CBI had not questioned her yet.
Meanwhile, Jesna’s father told South First that the new findings regarding Jesna’s disappearance were completely wrong.
“The CBI has already looked into these findings. The witness’s revelations are the same as those in the old reports. The investigating officials have not inquired about the new update from me,” James said.
On 10 May this year, the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvananthapuram ordered the CBI to continue the investigation into the case.
The order was issued following a petition from her father who submitted some new evidence to the court. The court examined the evidence submitted by James in sealed covers and asked the CBI to continue its investigation.
Earlier, the CBI had closed the investigation and informed the court that it would continue the probe if more evidence were available.
Issuing the order, the court handed over the evidence submitted by James to the CBI.
Jesna Maria James, a 20-year-old second-year BCom student, left her home at Mukkoottuthara in Kerala’s Pathanamthitta district around 9 am on 22 March, 2018.
The student of St Dominic’s College in Kanjirappally was supposed to visit her aunt at Punchavayal in Mundakayam, hardly 20 km from her home. She took an autorickshaw and later a local bus to Erumely, before boarding another bus to Mundakayam.
And then, the bespectacled women vanished into the blue.
Five years later, the CBI ended its probe to find Jesna, citing lack of any substantial evidence in the case. The premier probe agency however, ruled out the possibility of the young woman converting to another religion, a narrative that was peddled by vested political interests.
She had not committed suicide either, the CBI said in its 52-page closure report submitted to the Chief Judicial Magistrate court.
The CBI had taken up the probe based on a high court directive issued on 19 February, 2021.
Vested interests raised the so-called ‘love jihad’ bogey even as Jesna’s relatives and collegemates staged a sit-in, demanding the authorities find the young woman. Despite the Union government and the Supreme Court ruling out any instance of ‘love jihad’ in Kerala, a major section of the powerful Catholic Church refused to agree.
Instead, it shared Sangh Parivar’s theory of Islamic terrorists faking love to lure young women of other faiths and issued frequent edicts to keep teenage Christian girls out of harm’s way.
Jesna is frequently mentioned in many of the pastoral letters issued on behalf of senior Catholic bishops in Kerala.
Multiple investigations could not track Jesna’s presence anywhere beyond Erumeli, though the probe took investigators to various states. The CBI, through Interpol, issued a yellow alert in 191 countries to find the young woman in April 2022. The yellow notice is a global alert for a missing person.
Throughout these years, Catholic bishops have been steadfastly maintaining that Jesna was a victim of ‘love jihad’.
BJP state president K Surendran found an opportunity in her disappearance to reach out to the Catholic Christians, saying Jesna’s case was a classic example of ‘love jihadis’ targeting young Christian girls.
Right-wing Hindutva propaganda went a step further, saying Jesna was spotted in Syria with two children, and she and her husband were furthering the cause of the Islamic State.
The CBI’s closure report, however, categorically ruled out the ‘love jihad’ angle. For Fancy and James, their daughter is still missing — but alive.
The CBI report exposed vested interests stoking Islamophobia to create divisions and unrest in society.
It stated that religious conversion and extremism were not the driving forces behind her disappearance. The CBI informed the court that it had investigated all centres of religious conversions across the country, as well as offices of so-called extremist Islamic organisations before concluding that they had no role in Jesna’s disappearance.
The agency even checked with Kozhikode-based Arya Samaj, which converts non-Hindus to the Hindu community. The report also said there was no concrete evidence to establish that she had been murdered or committed suicide.
It suggested she could still be alive.
CBI sleuths investigated several so-called suicide points across the country. It also went through the national registry of unnatural deaths over the past five years and conducted searches based on it across Kerala, Chennai, and Mumbai.
Expert divers were roped in to search the Lower Periyar dam in the Idukki district following a suspicion that her body could have been dumped there. Brain-mapping tests conducted on Jesna’s father and her friend did not find anything suspicious.
The CBI further said Jesna’s circle of friends was limited, and she was always confined to her private world. She was never active on social media and had not taken her keypad-based mobile phone while leaving home.
(With inputs from Sreelakshmi Soman)
(South First is now on WhatsApp and Telegram)
