Published Aug 10, 2026 | 12:40 PM ⚊ Updated Aug 10, 2026 | 12:40 PM
HRF condemns Vizag police preventing peaceful protest against data centres
Synopsis: “A government that claims its data-centre policies serve the public interest should welcome public scrutiny, not seek to suppress it. It cannot defend its policies by deploying the police against citizens who question them. The police may enforce the law, but they do not have the authority to police dissent. In a democracy, the police have no business dictating where citizens may gather, what they may say or whether they may even take a photograph before Bhagat Singh’s statue,” the statement said.
The Human Rights Forum (HRF) on Monday, 10 August, strongly condemned the conduct of the Visakhapatnam police in preventing citizens from peacefully campaigning against the “indiscriminate proliferation of massive data centres in and around the city.”
To mark the anniversary of the Quit India movement, members of the environmental group Green Visakha had called for a peaceful environmental awareness procession on the Vizag beach road for Sunday, 9 August, evening to sensitise citizens to the potentially far-reaching environmental and social consequences of AI data centres being aggressively pushed by the government.
The statement from HRF noted, “The campaign aimed to confront the serious questions arising from the sheer scale and concentration of these projects. It sought to draw attention to the enormous demands on water and power, the intensifying pressure on groundwater and other natural resources, the pollution and waste they would generate and the wider ecological costs of allowing multiple data centre facilities to proliferate in and around a city already stretched to its limits in land, water, energy and civic infrastructure.”
Also Read: ‘Ecological recklessness’: HRF demands withdrawal of green nod for Vizag data centre project
According to the HRF statement, the police had earlier refused permission for the proposed procession. However, when around 20-25 members of Green Visakha and other citizens opposed to the data centre projects gathered peacefully at the Bhagat Singh statue, the police arrived and objected even to this modest assembly.
“The gathering wished to conduct a perfectly legitimate democratic campaign. They wanted to distribute pamphlets and draw public attention to the enormous cumulative environmental, social and economic costs of the data-centre projects being pushed through in the region. There was no threat whatsoever to public order, no obstruction to traffic or the public and no disturbance of any kind. Yet the police insisted that the gathering disperse,” the statement read.
Further detailing the confrontation with police, the HRF statement said, “The participants, despite having every reason to challenge this arbitrary diktat, chose to comply and agreed to disperse peacefully. But what happened next exposed a disturbing police impulse not merely to regulate a gathering, but to police dissent itself. Before leaving, the participants wanted to take a group photograph in front of the Bhagat Singh statue. A sub-inspector of police responded by telling them: ‘Go anywhere and take a photo, but not here in front of Bhagat Singh’s statue.’”
Expressing concern, the statement further read: “This is an astonishing statement from a police officer. By what law can the police prohibit citizens from merely standing before a public statue and taking a photograph? What conceivable threat to public order could a group photograph possibly constitute? The irony is truly profound. Bhagat Singh’s statue is a public symbol of resistance to injustice and tyranny. Yet citizens standing peacefully before it are apparently to be treated as a threat because they are protesting a plainly retrograde government policy.”
The HRF noted that the incident cannot be dismissed as an isolated instance of police high-handedness. “It comes amid a growing pattern of attempts to restrict public discussion and prevent engagement with people affected by the data-centre projects.”
“Over the past several weeks, functionaries of Left political parties were detained when they attempted to visit Tarluvada village to meet residents who had been dispossessed of their land for a data-centre project. Why should activists be prevented from meeting people who have lost their land? What possible threat to public order could there be in citizens listening to the grievances of affected communities and seeking to help get them resolved? There has also been an alarming effort to suppress criticism of these projects online, with social media content critical of data centre projects being pulled down at the government’s instance.”
The HRF further raised the question: Why is the government seeking to insulate these data-centre projects from public scrutiny and trying to intimidate those who question them?
Critiquing the police, the statement noted, “The constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and peaceful assembly are not privileges that the police may grant or withdraw at will. They are fundamental rights. The State may impose lawful, reasonable and constitutionally permissible restrictions but cannot simply suppress a political campaign it deems inconvenient by denying permission, dispersing citizens and detaining activists. The police are not the arbiters of which political opinions citizens may express, where they may peacefully assemble, or even before which public monument they may take a photograph. Reasonable regulation of public assemblies may sometimes be necessary, but regulation cannot become a pretext for suppressing dissent.”
Also Read: Infrastructure and business reforms take centre stage at Andhra Pradesh Cabinet meet
Reiterating that the data-centre expansion raises legitimate and urgent questions about land acquisition, displacement, water consumption, electricity, environmental degradation and the diversion of public resources, the HRF said, “Questioning these plainly destructive processes is a democratic right and must not be construed as a law-and-order problem. The State cannot answer inconvenient questions with police action nor silence dissent by treating citizens as a threat.”
“HRF demands an immediate end to this police interference with peaceful democratic activity. The government must ensure that citizens are free to campaign, assemble, distribute literature, raise slogans, meet affected communities and express dissent without intimidation or arbitrary police obstruction,” it added.
“A government that claims its data-centre policies serve the public interest should welcome public scrutiny, not seek to suppress it. It cannot defend its policies by deploying the police against citizens who question them. The police may enforce the law, but they do not have the authority to police dissent. In a democracy, the police have no business dictating where citizens may gather, what they may say or whether they may even take a photograph before Bhagat Singh’s statue,” the statement said.
