Arguments over, verdict awaited on Chandrababu Naidu’s petition seeking house custody

Lawyers for Naidu, who enjoys Z-plus security cover, sought house custody for their client, fearing a threat to his life in jail.

ByRaj Rayasam

Published Sep 11, 2023 | 8:39 PMUpdatedSep 11, 2023 | 8:39 PM

Chandrababu Naidu arrest

Arguments on a petition requesting house custody for former Andhra Pradesh chief minister N Chandrababu Naidu concluded in the ACB court in Vijayawada on Monday, 11 September. The verdict is awaited.

Naidu, arrested by the Crime Investigation Department (CID) in the multi-crore skill development scam and remanded in custody for 14 days, moved the petition for house custody on Sunday, 10 September, citing security reasons.

The TDP supremo — who is protected by Z-plus security, the highest security category in India — was arrested in a pre-dawn swoop on Saturday.

Supreme Court lawyer Siddhartha Luthra, who appeared for Naidu, sought house custody for his client, fearing a threat to his life in jail.

He said that until now Naidu had the protection of the National Security Guard (NSG) but in the central prison, the security might not be adequate.

Related: Naidu, TDP ultimate beneficiaries of skill development scam, says CID

Additional Advocate General P Sudhakar Reddy, appearing for the CID, argued that Naidu would be safer in jail than outside.

He said the TDP leader was in good health and enough security had been provided to him. He said that should the need arise, the government was ready to provide necessary help.

ACB court special judge B Satya Venkata Hima Bindu had already ordered all facilities, including heightened security, by allotting him a special room to Naidu considering his status as the Opposition leader in the Andhra Pradesh Assembly.

The judge also allowed him home-cooked food and medicines to be supplied from outside.

Related: Court prima facie found material to show Naidu’s nexus with others

CID files two petitions, seeks Naidu’s custody

Meanwhile, the CID filed a petition seeking Naidu’s custody for five days for further interrogation.

The investigation agency also filed another petition in the ACB court for a prisoner transit (PT) warrant to question Naidu in the under-investigation Amaravati Inner Ring Road scam.

The Inner Ring Road case accused the erstwhile TDP government of resorting to corruption and encroachment of lands.

The CID, in the FIR registered in 2022, said that the government resorted to irregularities while finalising the road’s alignment.

The CID alleged that Naidu and former minister P Narayana were involved in changing the design of the road to facilitate the exponential appreciation of the value of lands owned by TDP leaders and those who close to them.

Related: TDP’s Andhra bandh against Naidu’s arrest evokes partial response

Court order on Sunday

Earlier, on Sunday, Naidu’s petition against the remand report filed by the CID fell apart when the special judge decided there was prima facie a case of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and corruption against him.

Naidu was arrested early morning on Saturday, 9 September, in the alleged ₹279 crore skill development scam that took place when he was the chief minister.

The CID brought the charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA).

The Special Judge for Special Police Establishment (SPE) and and Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) cases in Vijayawada, while determining the charges, issued the order remanding Naidu in judicial custody for 14 days at the Rajahmundry Central Prison.