Telangana government backs down on Kancha Gachibowli row; committee to consult stakeholders

Telangana Chief Minister announced a high-level committee to address the Kancha Gachibowli land issue. The committee, led by ministers Bhatti Vikramarka, Sridhar Babu, and Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy, will consult stakeholders

Published Apr 03, 2025 | 10:09 PMUpdated Apr 03, 2025 | 10:18 PM

Telangana government backs down on Kancha Gachibowli row; committee to consult stakeholders

Synopsis: In response to the Kancha Gachibowli land controversy, Telangana CM has announced a high-level committee to resolve the issue. The committee will consult with key stakeholders, including the Hyderabad Central University, JAC, and civil society groups. Ministers Bhatti Vikramarka, Sridhar Babu, and Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy will lead discussions to find a way forward.

In response to the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kancha Gachibowli land issue, Telangana Chief Minister on Thursday, 3 April, has announced the formation of a high-level committee to consult with key stakeholders and devise a resolution.

This comes as a huge step down for the Revanth Reddy government that had been continuing to raze green cover despite strong protests by students.

The committee, comprising ministers Shri Bhatti Vikramarka, Shri Sridhar Babu, and Shri Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy, will engage with the Hyderabad Central University executive committee, Joint Action Committee (JAC), civil society groups, student delegations, and other concerned stakeholders to chart a way forward.

Supreme Court’s stay on tree felling

The decision comes in the wake of the Supreme Court’s stern stance against deforestation in the disputed 400-acre land parcel.

On 3 April, the apex court stayed the felling of trees, issuing a warning that the Telangana Chief Secretary, Shanthi Kumari, would be held personally liable for any violations. Expressing shock over large-scale deforestation, the court took suo motu cognizance of the matter and sought an explanation from the state government.

Earlier on 3 April, the Supreme Court had directed the Registrar (Judicial) of the Telangana High Court to conduct a site inspection and submit a report by 3:30 PM. Following the findings, the bench, comprising Justices BR Gavai and AG Masih, raised serious concerns about the environmental impact of the deforestation and demanded answers from the state government.

Also Read: KTR’s stern warning to HCU land buyers

Court’s Queries and Restrictions

The Supreme Court listed five specific queries for the Telangana government:

  1. What was the urgency behind undertaking developmental activities, including tree felling, in the alleged forest area?
  2. Did the state obtain Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) certification for the proposed development?
  3. Were necessary permissions from forest authorities and other regulatory bodies secured before initiating tree felling?
  4. Why was a committee of five officers constituted for identifying forests when they seemingly have no expertise in the matter?
  5. What has the state done with the felled trees?

The court explicitly directed, “Until further orders, no activity of any sort, except the protection of trees already existing, shall be undertaken by the state.” The Chief Secretary was warned of personal liability in case of non-compliance.

State’s defense and legal developments

Advocate Gaurav Agarwal, representing Telangana, reiterated the government’s argument that the land in question is not a designated forest. However, the court remained unconvinced and questioned whether the government had obtained the required permissions to cut trees across 100 acres within a span of just two to three days. Justice Gavai reminded the government, “Howsoever high one may be, none is above the law.”

Meanwhile, the Telangana High Court has scheduled the next hearing on the Public Interest Litigations (PILs) related to the Kancha Gachibowli land auction for 7 April. Senior advocate AM Singhvi, appearing for the state, requested time to file a counter affidavit, which the court granted. Justice Sujoy Paul extended the stay on tree felling until the next hearing.

(Edited by Ananya Rao)

Follow us