On 31 May 2015, Revanth Reddy, then with the TDP, was apprehended while allegedly paying ₹50 lakh bribe to a nominated MLA for supporting TDP nominee in the council elections.
Published Feb 10, 2024 | 10:14 AM ⚊ Updated Feb 10, 2024 | 10:14 AM
Revanth Reddy (X)
The Supreme Court on Friday, 9 February, agreed to hear a petition seeking the transfer of the trial in a 2015 cash-for-vote scam case, in which Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy is an accused, from the state to Bhopal.
A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta issued notices to the state of Telangana, Revanth Reddy, and others seeking their responses on the plea filed by Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLA Guntakandla Jagadish Reddy and three others.
The apex court has posted the matter for hearing after four weeks.
On 31 May 2015, Revanth Reddy, then with the Telugu Desam Party, was apprehended by the anti-corruption bureau (ACB) while allegedly paying ₹50 lakh bribe to Elvis Stephenson, a nominated MLA, for supporting TDP nominee Vem Narendar Reddy in the legislative council elections.
Apart from Revanth Reddy, the ACB had arrested some others. All of them were later granted bail.
The plea, seeking transfer of the trial to Bhopal, has raised the issue of a free and fair trial saying that Revanth Reddy has now become the chief minister as well as the home minister of Telangana.
“Because a true and fair trial is sine qua non of Article 21 of the Constitution, which declares that a criminal trial has to be unbiased, and without any prejudice for or against the accused, the trial has to be impartial and uninfluenced which is the fundamental requirement of a fair trial and the first and the foremost imperative of the criminal justice delivery system,” stated the plea, filed through advocate P Mohith Rao.
It said if a criminal trial is not free and fair, the criminal justice system would undoubtedly be at stake, eroding the confidence of a common person in the system which would not augur well for the society at large.
“Because most of the prosecution witnesses were examined in chief and the accused no.1 being the chief (minister) and home minister for the State of Telangana can directly influence the de-facto complainant and officers pressurizing them to defer/resile from their earlier statements and further to depose false and there is every possibility that the officers/de-facto complainant will resile/defer from their earlier statements or will depose falsely under the threat,” the plea claimed.
The plea has also sought a transfer of the trial in another connected case from a court in Telangana to Bhopal.
On January 5, the apex court had deferred till February the hearing of A Revanth Reddy’s separate petition challenging the high court order dismissing his plea questioning the jurisdiction of an ACB court in conducting the trial in the 2015 cash-for-vote scam case.
Reddy has challenged the June 1, 2021 order of the high court by which his plea questioning the jurisdiction of the special ACB court to conduct the trial in the case was dismissed.
In July 2015, the ACB filed a charge sheet against Reddy and others under the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.
The ACB had then claimed it had collected clinching evidence against the accused in the form of audio/video recordings and recovered an advance amount of ₹50 lakh.
(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)
