A five-judge constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, reserved its judgment after a 10-day hearing in the matter.
Published May 11, 2023 | 8:16 PM ⚊ Updated May 11, 2023 | 8:16 PM
The SC was hearing a batch of pleas seeking legal validation for same-sex marriage. (Commons)
The Supreme Court on Thursday, 11 May, reserved its verdict on a batch of pleas seeking legal validation for same-sex marriage.
A five-judge constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, reserved its judgement after a 10-day hearing on the matter.
The bench, also comprising Justices SK Kaul, SR Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narasimha, heard the rejoinder arguments advanced by senior advocates, including AM Singhvi, Raju Ramachandran, KV Viswanathan, Anand Grover, and Saurabh Kirpal, who represented the petitioners.
During the hearing on Wednesday, the Centre told the apex court that any constitutional declaration made by it on pleas seeking legal validation for same-sex marriage may not be the “correct course of action” as the court would not be able to foresee, envisage, comprehend, and deal with its fallout.
The bench had observed that everyone was presuming that the declaration would be in the form of a writ.
“We are all presuming that the declaration will be in the form of a writ that ‘grant this’ or ‘grant that’. This is what we are accustomed to. What I was hinting at was that, as a constitutional court, we recognise only a state of affairs and draw the limit there,” Justice SR Bhat said.
The Centre had also told the court that it received responses from seven states on the issue of same-sex marriage and that the governments of Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, and Assam had opposed the petitioners’ contention seeking legal validation for such wedlock.
(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)
