SC to set up 5-judge bench to hear pleas on polygamy, ‘nikah halala’ at an ‘appropriate stage’

Lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay, in his PIL, has sought a direction to declare polygamy and "nikah halala" unconstitutional and illegal.

Published Mar 23, 2023 | 2:32 PMUpdated Mar 23, 2023 | 2:32 PM

Nikah Halala

The Supreme Court said on Thursday, 23 March, it would set up a fresh five-judge Constitution bench at an “appropriate stage” to hear pleas challenging the constitutional validity of polygamy and “nikah halala” among Muslims.

A bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala was urged by lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay, who has filed a PIL on the issue, that Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code allowed polygamy, halala, etc, and needed to be struck down.

“I will consider it. At an appropriate stage, I will constitute a constitution bench,” the CJI responded.

Also read: SC to consider plea on Muslim girls’ marriage

Responses sought

On 30 August last year, a five-judge bench comprising Justices Indira Banerjee, Hemant Gupta, Surya Kant, MM Sundresh and Sudhanshu Dhulia had made the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), National Commission for Women (NCW) and the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) parties to the PILs and sought their responses.

Justice Banerjee and Justice Gupta retired on 23 September and 6 October last year respectively giving rise to the need for re-constitution of the bench to hear as many as eight petitions against the practices of polygamy and “nikah halala”.

Upadhyay, in his PIL, sought a direction to declare polygamy and “nikah halala” unconstitutional and illegal.

While polygamy allows a Muslim man to have four wives, ‘nikah halala’ deals with the process in which a Muslim woman, who wants to re-marry her husband after divorce, has to first marry another person and get a divorce from him after consummation.

The apex court had in July 2018 considered the plea and referred the matter to a Constitution bench already tasked with hearing a batch of similar petitions.

(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)

Follow us