The Nagarothana scheme (phase-3) at an estimated cost of ₹1,000 crore was launched to upgrade infrastructure in 10 city corporations.
Published Dec 23, 2022 | 6:23 PM ⚊ Updated Dec 23, 2022 | 6:23 PM
Ballari Junction Railway Station. (Creative Commons)
The city corporations of Ballari, Tumakuru and Vijayapura have “diverted” ₹108.75 crore of funds meant for the Chief Minister’s Nagarothana scheme to other projects, in contravention of guidelines, the Comptroller & Auditor General (CAG) has said.
The CAG’s performance audit on the “Mukhyamantrigala Nagarothana” scheme (phase-3) for city corporations was tabled in the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on Friday, 23 December.
The Nagarothana scheme (phase-3) at an estimated cost of ₹1,000 crore was launched to upgrade infrastructure in 10 city corporations, with each one getting ₹100 crore.
The performance audit covered the period 2014-15 to 2020-21 in Ballari, Mysuru, Tumakuru, and Vijayapura.
According to the CAG findings, “In contravention of the scheme guidelines, the test checked city corporations diverted ₹108.75 crore (40 percent of the total expenditure of ₹269.28 crore) towards work taken up under other schemes.”
It was towards “paying their contribution amounts for other schemes- AMRUT, Rajiv Gandhi Awas Yojana and 24×7 water supply- or on works being executed under other grants,” it said.
This deprived the city corporations of the full benefit which was to be accrued from the scheme, the CAG said, as it rejected the government’s claim that this was not a diversion but a utilisation of funds towards other schemes.
“Scheme guidelines specifically prohibited funding of works taken up under other schemes. The reply was also silent regarding utilisation of scheme funds for ineligible components such as payment of land compensation, construction of building etc,” it added.
Further pointing out that the appointment of three project management consultants (PMC) for Belagavi, Davangere, Hubballi-Dharwad, Mysuru, Shivamogga, Tumakuru and Vijayapura was “incorrect”, the CAG said, “undue favour led to works worth ₹14.63 crore being awarded to these ineligible consultants.”
“They did not meet the selection criteria and were liable to be rejected,” it said.
(Disclaimer: Only the headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed)
