One biscuit less in pack, consumer forum in Tamil Nadu directs ITC to pay ₹1 lakh as compensation

It dismissed the company's submission that the challenge made with regard to the weight of biscuits would not apply.

ByPTI

Published Sep 06, 2023 | 5:00 PMUpdatedSep 06, 2023 | 5:00 PM

ITC

The district consumer forum in Tiruvallur in Tamil Nadu has directed ITC Ltd Food Division to pay a sum of ₹1 lakh to a consumer for alleged unfair trade practice after he complained that packets of the corporate’s biscuit brand Sunfeast Marie Light had one biscuit lesser than that advertised on the wrapper.

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, in a recent order, also directed the company to “discontinue the selling of the disputed biscuits ‘Sunfeast Marie Light’ in Batch No.0502C36 with the specific endorsement.”

It dismissed the company’s submission that the challenge made with regard to the weight of biscuits would not apply.

Complainant P Dillibabu of Chennai alleged there were only 15 biscuits inside the packets as against the advertised 16.

Also read: Karnataka is releasing Cauvery water to TN, SC is informed

‘Consumers decide by seeing the packet’

“It is argued by the learned counsel for the 1st opposite party (the company) that the product was sold only based on the weight and not on the number of biscuits. Such arguments could not be accepted as the wrapper clearly provides the information to the buyers/consumers to purchase the product only based on the number of biscuits,” the order said.

“The potential consumer would only see the wrapper to decide the purchase of the product as the product information available on the packing influences the consumer’s buying behaviour and that the product information available on the wrapper or label plays a significant role in customer satisfaction,” it added..

In the present case, the paramount allegation is only with regard to a lesser number of biscuits.

“Thus we answer the point accordingly holding that the 1st opposite party being the manufacturer and marketer had committed unfair trade practice and deficiency in service in misleading the consumers and that the complainant had successfully proved the same by sufficient admissible evidence,” it said.

While Dillibabu sought to impose ₹100 crore fine on the company and the store that sold it and ₹10 crore as compensation for the alleged act of unfair trade practice and deficiency in service, it said the reliefs sought by the complainant was exorbitant.

Also read: Shopkeeper in Vaniyambadi dies of swine flu; state records 4th death

‘Shopkeeper had no role’

The 2nd opposite party being the shopkeeper had no role to play with respect to the reduction in the number of biscuits. “Hence, complaint dismissed against him,” it said.

The consumer forum subsequently directed that ₹1 lakh be given as compensation to Dillibabu by the company and another ₹10,000 towards litigation expenses to be paid by it to him.

In its defence, ITC submitted that there was no deficiency or defect in the 76-gram biscuit packs of Sunfeast Marie Light in terms of the quantity that the packs were required to maintain under the law.

Citing Legal Metrology Rules 2011, it contended that if a pre-packaged commodity has a declared net quantity between 50 gram to 100 gram, then a maximum permissible error in excess or in deficiency of 4.5 gram of the declared quantity was allowed on such items.

As per the rules, a package that has a declared weight of 76 g was permitted to weigh between 71.5 g to 80.5 g, it said.

(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)