Published Nov 25, 2023 | 2:06 PM ⚊ Updated Nov 25, 2023 | 2:06 PM
Karnataka High Court. (Creative Commons)
The High Court of Karnataka has directed the Chief Commissioner of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), and Secretary of e-Governance “to come up with a system of verifying the identification of the person who is dead on the basis of e-KYC-like usage of Aadhaar”.
This was necessary, the court said, “so that no error occurs in the details which are entered firstly by the hospital and secondly while issuing the death certificate”.
The direction by the bench of Justice Suraj Govindaraj came on a petition filed by Sai Lakshmi seeking rectification of the errors in the death certificate of her husband.
Her husband, Lakshmikantha SP, a primary school assistant master in Bagepalli in Chikkaballapura district, died on 22 November, 2022, at Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology.
The death was registered on 30 November, 2022, by the hospital in terms of a medical certificate issued in Form No 4. Subsequently, the BBMP issued a death certificate on 9 December, 2022.
The death certificate, however, had several discrepancies, including the name of the mother of Lakshmikantha mentioned as “Vijaya Lakshmi Kantha” instead of “Vijaya Lakshmi”.
The father’s name was mentioned as “late P Reddanna” instead of “late Peddanna”, while the name of the wife of the deceased was mentioned as “Peddanna” instead of “Sai Lakshmi”.
The woman filed an application for correction of the details, which was rejected on the grounds that these details were entered by the hospital and therefore no correction can be made by the BBMP unless an order is obtained from the jurisdictional Court.
The woman then approached the high court with a petition.
The high court noted that in the current scheme of things, “Whenever a death occurs in a hospital the entries made by the hospital are taken to be sacrosanct and the death certificate issued. I am of the considered opinion that the said process can give rise to several anomalies and can be misused.”
The court therefore directed that a system be put in place for e-verification of all deaths.
“It would also be required that certificates like birth and death certificates are credentialed and digitised to enable e-verification as also to be used in the DigiLocker application so that any third party before such certificate is produced can easily verify the same to be genuine or not,” the court said.
It further noted that “Every aspect of human life being digitised and the existence or otherwise of a human being now being determined on the basis of electronic and digital data available, there are bound to be some genuine/bonafide data entry errors which would have to be rectified by the concerned officers instead of constraining citizens to approach a court of law.”
The HC has directed that the matter be relisted on 14 December 2023 so that the Chief Commissioner, BBMP and the Secretary e-Governance file a compliance report.
In the matter related to the death certificate of Lakshmikantha, the HC directed the Joint Director (Statistical), Births and Deaths and Assistant Joint Director, (Births and Deaths) BBMP to consider the application made by Sai Lakshmi for corrections and to issue a fresh death certificate within 20 days.
(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)
