Sharjeel Imam granted bail by Delhi High Court in sedition case

Imam contended that he has undergone more than half of the maximum sentence that can be awarded to him in case of a conviction.


Published May 29, 2024 | 2:23 PM Updated May 29, 2024 | 2:23 PM

Sharjeel Imam. (Facebook)

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday, 29 May, granted bail to student activist Sharjeel Imam in connection with a 2020 communal riots case involving allegations of sedition and unlawful activities.

Imam assailed a trial court order refusing to grant him bail even though he has undergone more than half of the maximum sentence that can be awarded to him in case of a conviction.

“Appeal is allowed,” a bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Manoj Jain said after hearing the counsel for Imam and the Delhi Police.

Also Read: When media assumed KCR was the ‘father’ indicted in ED report on Delhi liquor policy case

Allegations against Imam

According to the prosecution, Imam allegedly made speeches at Jamia Millia Islamia on 13 December, 2019 and at the Aligarh Muslim University on 16 December, 2019 where he threatened to cut off Assam and the rest of the North East from the country.

Imam was booked in the case registered by Delhi Police’s Special Branch, which was initially registered for the offence of sedition and Section 13 of UAPA was invoked later. He has been in custody since 28 January, 2020 in the matter.

Imam had claimed before the trial court that he has been in custody for the last four years and the maximum sentence for the offence under section 13 (punishment for unlawful activities) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act is 7 years, if convicted.

As per Section 436-A CrPC, a person can be released from custody if he has spent more than half of the maximum sentence prescribed for the offence.

The trial court, while refusing to grant him bail on 17 February, had ruled that the accused’s custody could be extended for a further period in “exceptional circumstances” after hearing the prosecution’s case.

Imam is an accused in several cases arising from the communal riots of 2020, including the case concerning alleged larger conspiracy behind the violence. He is in judicial custody in the conspiracy case as well.

(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)