Criminal laws passed ‘forcibly’, INDIA will not allow ‘bulldozer justice’: Mallikarjun Kharge

P Chidambaram also slammed the government and said it was another case of "bulldozing" existing laws and replacing them with three new Bills.

BySouth First Desk

Published Jul 01, 2024 | 1:27 PM Updated Jul 01, 2024 | 7:24 PM

PM Modi in a perpetual state of denial, says Kharge on President's address

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Monday, 1 July, claimed that the three new criminal laws were passed “forcibly” after suspending 146 MPs in the last Lok Sabha, and asserted that the INDIA bloc will not allow such “bulldozer justice” to prevail in the country’s parliamentary system.

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram also slammed the government and said it was another case of “bulldozing” existing laws and replacing them with three new Bills without adequate discussion and debate.

The former home minister said that in the long term, further changes must be made to the three laws to bring them in conformity with the Constitution and the modern principles of criminal jurisprudence.

The three new criminal laws came into effect in the country on Monday, bringing far-reaching changes in India’s criminal justice system.

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) take into account some of the current social realities and modern-day crimes.

The new laws replaced the British-era Indian Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure and the Indian Evidence Act, respectively.

Also Read: Two steps backwards in the fight towards gender-neutral offences

‘Passed forcible’

In a post in Hindi on X, Kharge said, “After the political and moral shock in the elections, Modi ji and the BJP are pretending to respect the Constitution, but the truth is that the three laws of the criminal justice system which are being implemented from today, were passed forcibly after suspension of 146 MPs.”

“INDIA will no longer allow this ‘bulldozer justice’ to prevail in the parliamentary system,” he asserted.

In a post on X, Chidambaram said, “90-99 per cent of the so-called new laws are a cut, copy and paste job. A task that could have been completed with a few amendments to the existing three laws has been turned into a wasteful exercise.”

“Yes, there are a few improvements in the new laws and we have welcomed them. They could have been introduced as amendments. On the other hand, there are several retrograde provisions. Some changes are prima facie unconstitutional,” he said.

MPs who were members of the standing committee pored over the provisions and wrote detailed dissent notes to the three bills, the senior leader said.

Also Read: Union government launches Prahari Portal to fight drug abuse among children

‘Did not answer criticisms’

Chidambaram added the government did not rebut or answer any of the criticisms in the dissent notes and there was no worthwhile debate in Parliament.

“Law scholars, bar associations, judges and lawyers have in numerous articles and seminars pointed out the grave deficiencies in the three new laws. No one in government has cared to answer the questions,” he said.

“It is another case of bulldozing three existing laws and replace them with three new Bills without adequate discussion and debate,” Chidambaram said.

The initial impact will be to throw the administration of criminal justice into disarray, he said.

“In the medium term, numerous challenges to the laws will be instituted in various courts. In the long term, further changes must be made to the three laws to bring them in conformity with the Constitution and the modern principles of criminal jurisprudence,” Chidambaram said.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who piloted the laws, had said the new laws would give priority to providing justice, unlike the colonial-era laws that gave primacy to penal action.

From Monday, all fresh FIRs will be registered under the BNS. However, cases filed earlier will continue to be tried under the old laws till their final disposal.

(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)

(South First is now on WhatsApp and Telegram)