Supreme Court orders all courts not to mention caste, religion of litigants in case papers

A Bench directed all high courts to ensure that the caste or religion of a litigant does not appear in the memo of parties in any petition.

ByPTI

Published Jan 29, 2024 | 5:13 PMUpdatedJan 29, 2024 | 5:13 PM

Supreme Court of India

The practice of mentioning the caste or religion of litigants in court cases must be shunned, the Supreme Court has said while directing its registry and all other courts to stop it immediately.

A Bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah directed all high courts to ensure that the caste or religion of a litigant does not appear in the memo of parties in any petition filed before high courts or subordinate courts under their jurisdiction.

“We see no reason for mentioning the caste/religion of any litigant either before this Court or the courts below. Such a practice is to be shunned and must be ceased forthwith.

Also Read: SC dismisses AP govt plea challenging anticipatory bail granted to Naidu

Directs not to use caste or religion

“It is, therefore, deemed appropriate to pass a general order directing that henceforth the caste or religion of parties shall not be mentioned in the memo of parties of a petition/proceeding filed before this court, irrespective of whether any such details have been furnished before the courts below,” the Bench said.

The top court passed the order while allowing a transfer petition in a marital dispute pending before a family court in Rajasthan.

The apex court expressed surprise that the caste of both the husband and wife was mentioned in the memo of the parties.

The counsel for the petitioner informed the court that if the memo of parties as filed before the courts below is changed in any manner, the Registry raises an objection, and in the present case, as the caste of both the parties was mentioned before the court below, he had no option but to mention their caste in the transfer petition.

The top court directed that its order shall be brought to the notice of the members of the Bar as well as the Registry for immediate compliance.

“A copy of this order shall be placed before the Registrar concerned for perusal and for circulation tox the Registrar Generals of all the High Courts for strict compliance,” the Bench said.

(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)