NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha released on Supreme Court orders

Supreme Court delivered its verdict on Purkayastha's plea challenging the Delhi HC's October 13 2023 order dismissing his petition against arrest and subsequent police remand.

ByPTI

Published May 16, 2024 | 11:16 AMUpdatedMay 16, 2024 | 11:16 AM

Prabir Purkayastha

NewsClick founder and editor-in-chief Prabir Purkayastha was released from the Tihar Jail in Delhi on Wednesday, 15 May, hours after the Supreme Court declared his arrest “invalid”.

Purkayastha had been lodged in the jail since 2 November last year.

The Delhi Police’s Special Cell arrested Purkayastha on 3 October last year under the anti-terror law Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for allegedly receiving money to peddle pro-China propaganda through stories.

According to his lawyer Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Purkayastha came out of jail number 10 of the prison in Rohini at 9 pm. His family members and friends received him outside the jail complex.

Observing that the right to life and personal liberty was the “most sacrosanct” fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 20, 21 and 22 of the Constitution, the apex court said any person arrested over allegations of commission of offences under the UAPA or other offences has a fundamental and a statutory right to be informed about the grounds of arrest in writing.

Also Read: Supreme Court orders release of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha, declares his arrest ‘invalid’

Supreme Court’s judgement

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta said a copy of such written grounds of arrest have to be furnished to the arrested person as a “matter of course and without exception at the earliest”.

“From the detailed analysis made above, there is no hesitation in the mind of the court to reach to a conclusion that the copy of the remand application in the purported exercise of communication of the grounds of arrest in writing was not provided to the accused appellant (Purkayastha) or his counsel before passing of the order of remand dated 4 October 2023, which vitiates the arrest and subsequent remand of the appellant,” the bench said.

The top court delivered its verdict on Purkayastha’s plea challenging the Delhi High Court’s October 13 last year order dismissing his petition against arrest and subsequent police remand.

In its verdict, the bench said, “Accordingly, the arrest of the appellant followed by remand order dated 4 October 2023 and so also the impugned order passed by the High Court of Delhi dated 13 October 2023 are hereby declared to be invalid in the eyes of law and are quashed and set aside”.

(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)