The court also directed the state government to form an expert committee to formulate guidelines on the steps to be followed in MTP cases.
The Karnataka High Court has directed the state government to form an expert committee to formulate guidelines on the steps to be followed in cases of continuation of pregnancy or abortion — medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) — of a rape victim or a girl or a woman when she conceives.
The court was hearing a petition filed by a man whose 17-year-old daughter — a sexual-assault survivor — was pregnant with a 24-week-old foetus. He sought the court to grant orders for medical termination of pregnancy.
Following the hearing, the bench — headed by Justice Suraj Govindaraj — directed doctors at the Vani Vilas Women’s and Children Hospital in Bengaluru to go ahead with the termination of the pregnancy of the 24-week-old foetus of the petitioner’s daughter.
While allowing the rape victim to terminate her pregnancy that was in the 24th week, the court issued directions that the jurisdictional police involved in the case inform victims of the options available for termination of pregnancy so that they do not have to approach courts at a belated stage of pregnancy.
The 17-year-old survivor’s father approached the HC seeking MTP for her even as the trial was ongoing.
The minor girl was the survivor of a crime under Section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
As a result of the crime, she conceived and is currently 24 weeks pregnant. The petition by the survivor’s father claimed that the victim did not want to continue with the pregnancy and sought medical termination.
Justice Suraj Govindaraj, who heard the petition in his order on 11 December, said: “Such a situation would not have arisen if at all such a decision had been taken earlier. Then there would have been no requirement for the petitioner to approach this court.”
The court then directed the principal secretary of the state home department to issue necessary directions to all jurisdictional and/or investigating officers “to make known the availability of an option of medical termination of pregnancy, the procedure and process required to be followed for the same if the victim and/or natural guardian so desires”.
The investigating officer should also keep ready a member or a representative of the jurisdictional Child Welfare Committee (CWC) or the District Child Protection Unit, the court observed.
The court had also directed a medical board consisting of a gynaecologist, a paediatrician, and a psychologist to give an opinion on not only the physical health of the victim but also their mental well-being if she was to undergo a medical termination of pregnancy.
The report was submitted on 12 December, and the high court then allowed the MTP to be carried out.
The HC also ordered that after the MTP, the tissue samples of the foetus be preserved for the purpose of DNA analysis if required or ordered by the trial court in the POCSO case.
The high court’s guidelines on MTP of victims of sexual assaults are as follows: