Karnataka HC reserves judgement on application seeking stay on JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna’s disqualification

Prajwal has sought a stay on the 1 September judgement so that he can approach the Supreme Court with an appeal.

BySouth First Desk

Published Sep 08, 2023 | 6:52 PMUpdatedSep 08, 2023 | 6:52 PM

Two more arrests in Prajwal Revanna case

The High Court of Karnataka on Friday, 8 September, concluded hearing arguments on an application filed by the disqualified Member of Parliament from Hassan, Prajwal Revanna.

Justice K Natarajan, who heard the application, reserved the judgement, which is expected to be delivered either on 11 or 12 September.

The election of the grandson of former prime minister HD Deve Gowda was declared null and void on 1 September by the high court, which partly allowed two election petitions that had challenged his 2019 election to the Lok Sabha on grounds of malpractice.

Related: JD(S) loses lone MP in LS as Karnataka HC nullifies election of Prajwal

Sought stay to approach SC

Prajwal has sought a stay on the 1 September judgement so that he can approach the Supreme Court with an appeal.

The high court declared as “null and void” the election of the JD(S)’s Prajwal from the Hassan Lok Sabha seat for submitting a false affidavit while filing his nomination papers in 2019.

A single-judge bench of Justice Natarajan also disqualified him from contesting polls for the next six years.

The high court disqualified Prajwal based on petitions filed by the then BJP candidate, A Manju, and a voter in Hassan, Advocate Devarajegowda. Incidentally, Manju is now a JD(S) MLA from Arkalgud.

The high court also served notice on Holenarasipura MLA and Prajwal’s father HD Revanna in connection with the case.

First-time parliamentarian Prajwal defeated Manju by a margin of 1.41 lakh votes in 2019. Soon after the election, Manju and Devarajegowda filed separate petitions, accusing the Hassan MP of providing false information regarding his immovable assets and bank statements in the affidavit submitted to the Election Commission.

Also read: BS Yediyurappa announces BJP-JD(S) alliance for LS polls 2024

The false affidavit

The petitions cited several malpractices as well as non-declaration of assets. They claimed that Prajwal showed the value of the Chennambika Conventional Hall as ₹14 lakh, even as it was worth at least ₹5 crore.

It was also alleged that Prajwal declared a bank balance of ₹5 lakh despite having ₹48 lakh in his account. He was also accused of holding assets through benamis and committing income-tax fraud.

“Both the election petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed in part. The election of the returned candidate, Respondent No 1 namely MP Prajwal Revanna, Constituency 16, Hassan (General), having been declared as returned candidate dated 23.5.2019 is hereby declared as null and void,” Justice Natarajan had ruled.

The high court, however, dismissed the prayer of the petitioners to declare Manju as the winning candidate as he himself had been “involved in corrupt practices”.

“The prayer of the petitioners in both cases to declare A Manju as a returned candidate is rejected in view of the findings that he himself (is) involved in corrupt practices,” the court said.

The bench also directed the Election Commission to initiate action against Prajwal’s father Revanna (MLA and former minister) and brother Suraj Revanna (MLC) for election malpractice.

“HD Revanna and Suraj Revanna are named in the complaint under the Representation of People’s Act for having committed corrupt practice at the time of election and also A Manju, who is also involved in corrupt practice. Election Commission to issue notice and comply with Conduct of Election Process Rules,” the court said.

(With PTI inputs)