CM’s wife “illegally” allotted alternative land in Mysuru, alleges BJP; Siddaramaiah denies charge

Siddaramaiah rejected the charge saying his wife was entitled to an alternative land under a scheme, introduced by the previous BJP government

ByPTI

Published Jul 02, 2024 | 7:20 PM Updated Jul 02, 2024 | 7:20 PM

File photo of Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah.

The Opposition BJP in Karnataka on Tuesday, 2 July, alleged that Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) has “illegally” allotted an alternative land in a posh area to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s wife Parvathi against the “acquisition” of close to four acres owned by her.

The chief minister rejected the charge saying that his wife was entitled to an alternative land under the “50:50 ratio” scheme, introduced by the previous BJP government, after the MUDA formed a layout on her land without even acquiring it.

Under the scheme, a land loser gets a quarter acre of developed land against the acquisition of one acre of undeveloped land.

Also Read: New criminal laws leave Karnataka government, advocates fuming

‘Given during BJP’s tenure’

Siddaramaiah, who hails from Mysuru. also claimed that an alternative land was given to his wife during the previous BJP government and not during his tenure as the chief minister.

In a post on ‘X’, Leader of Opposition in the Karnataka Assembly R Ashoka sought to know how Siddaramaiah would justify the “illegal transfer of land.”

He also alleged that when the matter came to light, the concerned officers were transferred, instead of suspending them.

Ashoka said that the CBI or a retired high court judge should have probed the matter but the government assigned two IAS officers to investigate it “only to cover up the scam.”

“Who gave permission for allotment of land under 50:50 ratio? Who recommended allotment of land in posh areas? Who gave permission for the exchange of land in the posh area without cabinet approval?” the BJP leader sought to know.

Also Read: Karnataka action plan skipping critical issues irks child rights activists

Explains his version

Siddaramaiah said his brother-in-law Mallikarjuna had purchased three acres and 36 guntas of land in 1996 and gifted it to his sister, who is Siddaramaiah’s wife. (one acre is 40 guntas).

It was the BJP government which introduced the 50:50 ratio scheme, he said.

“MUDA did not acquire three acres and 36 guntas of land but created plots and sold them out. It is not that my wife’s property was acquired but plots were made and sold out. I don’t know whether MUDA did it knowingly or unknowingly,” the chief minister explained.

He added that after plots were made on his wife’s land and sold out by MUDA, she was deprived of her property.

“Should we lose our property? Shouldn’t MUDA give us our land legally? When we asked MUDA about it, they said they would give us land as per 50:50 ratio. We agreed to it. Then MUDA gave us equal measurements of sites in different places. What is wrong with that?” Siddaramaiah asked.

Meanwhile, following a report in a vernacular daily about an alleged large-scale scam pertaining to the allotment of alternative sites (plots) by MUDA, the Karnataka government ordered an inquiry by a panel headed by Commissioner of Urban Authorities Venkatachalapathy R.

The members of the panel are Additional Director, Town and Country Planning Shashi Kumar MC, Joint Director Town, Country Planning Commissionerate, Shanthala, and Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning, Prakash.

The panel has been asked to submit its report within 15 days, official sources said.

(Disclaimer: The headline, subheads, and intro of this report along with the photos may have been reworked by South First. The rest of the content is from a syndicated feed, and has been edited for style.)

(South First is now on WhatsApp and Telegram)